Skip to main content

BOB MARLEY: ONE LOVE Featurette

By
49 comments

Avengers: Infinity War 1 & 2 Will Be Retitled

By
Currently riding high on the critical and commercial success of Captain America: Civil War, directing siblings Anthony and Joe Russo will have nary a moment to catch their breath before diving back into the Marvel universe for the behemoth that is Avengers: Infinity War Parts One and Two. Or at least, that's what the movies are called for now; the directors have told Uproxx that the names will change.

Quite what the new titles will be has yet to be revealed, but the directors explained that they didn't want the public to be misled as to what the actual films are (besides Avengers instalments, obviously).

“The movies are two very different movies,” says Joe. “The intention is we will change it, we just haven’t come up with the titles yet. But, yes, we will change it.” What it boils down to is that the films won't act in the same way as franchises such as the Hunger Games and Divergent films have, splitting one story into two – the two new Avengers movies, despite being connected, will be very different films. Don't necessarily expect a big cliffhanger in the middle of the cosmic conflict. Right now, official details are few and far between, though it will entail the Marvel characters we know and love uniting to battle big bad Thanos (Josh Brolin), who will by that point be in possession of all – or almost all – the Infinity Stones for his shiny gauntlet and be intent on wiping everyone out.

We can still expect the first to arrive in 2018 and the second in 2019, but beyond that we'll have to wait and see what the Marvel braintrust decides to call them. Civil War is out now in the UK and elsewhere in the world and lands in the US on Friday.

Please Leave A Comment-
Source-Empire
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS In Austin

By
Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS on December 5th at 7:30 PM in Austin. MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS explores the turbulent life of Mary Stuart ( Saoirse Ronan ). Queen of France at 16 and widowed at 18, Mary defies pressure to remarry. Instead, she returns to her native Scotland to reclaim her rightful throne alongside her cousin Elizabeth I ( Margot Robbie ), who rules as England’s Queen. Rivals in power and in love, and female monarchs in a masculine world, the two must decide how to play the game of marriage versus independence. Determined to rule as much more than a figurehead, Mary asserts her claim to the English throne, threatening Elizabeth’s sovereignty. Betrayal, rebellion, and conspiracies within each court imperil both thrones – and change the course of history. CLICK HERE TO ENTER- #MaryQueenMovie www.focusfeatures.com/mary-queen-of-scots twitter.com/maryqueenmovie facebook.com/maryqueenmovie instagram.com/maryqueenmovie SEATING IS LIMITE...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sex Tape Review: Overly Sexual, Rude, Vulgar, and Absolutely Hilarious

By Matt Cummings
The raunchy Sex Tape will divide audiences and critics, but who cares? Sex Tape suggests a growing practice among loving partners: that of making a raunchy testament of their escapades for posterity. But what happens when that evidence gets seen by friends, neighbors, and even the mailman? This is the plot that pits Jay (Jason Segel) and Annie (Cameron Diaz) in an effort to secure every iPad gift Jay has given, his record company playlists being the envy of the recipients, but which has also inadvertently spread the video to every device. The reason for the act - termed in the movie as pulling "the full Lincoln " for its three-hour length - stems from the couple's non-existent social life, brought on by the constant demands of their children. The couple has a lot to lose: a burgeoning business relationship between Annie and Hank (Rob Lowe) could end if the iPad she's given to Hank exposes the video, and so the couple sets out to reclaim and wipe the incrim...
69 comments
Read more

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert?

By
Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert? We're halfway checked out for the holiday weekend, so let's end with bit of comedy. A litigious videogame player is calling Winona Ryder to testify as an expert in "alienation." Erik Estavillo has filed a $1 million lawsuit in California Superior Court against Activision Blizzard, publisher of "World of Warcraft," saying it "maintain(s) a harmful virtual environment to many of its customers by forcing them to follow the game's sneaky and deceitful practices." The plaintiff says he suffers from several mental health problems brought on by WoW's "alienating" features, such as forcing beginners to walk or run to get from one point to another instead of speedier options available to those who master the game or buy an expansion pack. Estavillo says that the slow pace is "deceitful" because more time = more subscription revenue for Activision. Here's where Winona Ryder comes...
Post a Comment
Read more