Skip to main content

BOB MARLEY: ONE LOVE Featurette

Monsters University Review. Is Enjoyable But Utterly Forgettable Fare

Monsters University Review
By: MattInRC

The prequel comedy Monsters University is funny, digestible, and ultimately forgettable.


How is it that a comedy which first arrived in 2001 took 12 more years to make a prequel-followup? It's not uncommon, but such time distance usually wrecks havoc on audiences' memories and appreciation of the current material. In other words, absence makes the heart forget. In almost an after-thought, Monsters University arrives ready to establish a franchise that should have started years ago. The result is an enjoyable but unremarkable film that takes too long to remind us why we liked Monsters Inc in the first place.


Set up as an origin story, our tale follows the rise of the one-eyed monster Mike (Billy Crystal, When Harry Met Sally) and the furry Sully (John Goodman, Flight) as they attend Monsters University, hoping to embark upon a professional career of scaring young sleepers. Mike is the bookworm and not a good test taker, while Sully is the lazy jock who won't elevate his game to become a great scarer. At first, the two do not get along, as they realize each other's potential on the first day of the program. When the two are kicked out of the Scare Program by the beetle-legged Dean Hardscrabble (Helen Mirren, Red), they decide to join the loser fraternity Oozma Kappa with hopes of getting back in. Kappa is filled with rejects and are the butt of jokes from Roar Omega Roar. Their leader, the bully Johnny (Nathan Fillion, Justice League: Doom) recruits Mike's former roommate Randy (Steve Buschemi, Hotel Transylvania) into his team, infuriating Sully and forcing Mike to teach teamwork to Oozma Kappa at the yearly Scare Games.


First-time Director Don Scanlon paints a pretty picture with life-like movements by the characters and realistic animated sets; but several characters - including the Oozma Kappa monsters - are unremarkable and more like the interchangeable Mr. Potato Head figures. Some of that blame comes by way of the script by Writer Robert L. Baird (Chicken Little), who fails to deliver any real or likeable characters beyond Sully and Mike. Potentially new memorable ones, like Dean Hardscrabble, are delivered flatly by Mirren, only furthering the problem of University's disposable characters. Ditto for Buschemi and Fillion, whose characters simply needed more air time. Granted, this is The Sully and Mike Show, but that doesn't mean others should have their development sacrificed at the expense of our leads. Goodman and Crystal still appreciate their characters, and their portrayals are the best things about University - Sully and Mike are genuinely funny to watch, from their various hijinks to their sleeping arrangements and the competition that ultimately binds them together.


It's this idea of monsters behaving like humans which probably made Monsters Inc. so appealing. And it's also this lack of human interaction which is probably at the root of University's failure. There's no Boo or a replacement for her, which I suppose is a unique aspect to University, but the lack of monsters doing human-like things removes a robust layer that produced one of Pixar's most beloved films. This is an origin story that's missing its heart, settling for situational comedy instead, and ultimately trickling down to the stolid performances of our secondary cast.



I suppose one day we'll apply The Lucas Phenomenon when watching Monsters University, that is to watch it first before the better Monsters Inc. But I hope the historical narrative will rightly criticize the previous for being 12 years too late and only half as good. Kids will be entertained, parents will lightly chuckle at the dorm room drinking games, but it's a production that won't stay with you when the lights come up. In that way, count University as a failure.

Please Leave A Comment-

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS In Austin

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS on December 5th at 7:30 PM in Austin. MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS explores the turbulent life of Mary Stuart ( Saoirse Ronan ). Queen of France at 16 and widowed at 18, Mary defies pressure to remarry. Instead, she returns to her native Scotland to reclaim her rightful throne alongside her cousin Elizabeth I ( Margot Robbie ), who rules as England’s Queen. Rivals in power and in love, and female monarchs in a masculine world, the two must decide how to play the game of marriage versus independence. Determined to rule as much more than a figurehead, Mary asserts her claim to the English throne, threatening Elizabeth’s sovereignty. Betrayal, rebellion, and conspiracies within each court imperil both thrones – and change the course of history. CLICK HERE TO ENTER- #MaryQueenMovie www.focusfeatures.com/mary-queen-of-scots twitter.com/maryqueenmovie facebook.com/maryqueenmovie instagram.com/maryqueenmovie SEATING IS LIMITE...

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert?

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert? We're halfway checked out for the holiday weekend, so let's end with bit of comedy. A litigious videogame player is calling Winona Ryder to testify as an expert in "alienation." Erik Estavillo has filed a $1 million lawsuit in California Superior Court against Activision Blizzard, publisher of "World of Warcraft," saying it "maintain(s) a harmful virtual environment to many of its customers by forcing them to follow the game's sneaky and deceitful practices." The plaintiff says he suffers from several mental health problems brought on by WoW's "alienating" features, such as forcing beginners to walk or run to get from one point to another instead of speedier options available to those who master the game or buy an expansion pack. Estavillo says that the slow pace is "deceitful" because more time = more subscription revenue for Activision. Here's where Winona Ryder comes...

Sex Tape Review: Overly Sexual, Rude, Vulgar, and Absolutely Hilarious

The raunchy Sex Tape will divide audiences and critics, but who cares? Sex Tape suggests a growing practice among loving partners: that of making a raunchy testament of their escapades for posterity. But what happens when that evidence gets seen by friends, neighbors, and even the mailman? This is the plot that pits Jay (Jason Segel) and Annie (Cameron Diaz) in an effort to secure every iPad gift Jay has given, his record company playlists being the envy of the recipients, but which has also inadvertently spread the video to every device. The reason for the act - termed in the movie as pulling "the full Lincoln " for its three-hour length - stems from the couple's non-existent social life, brought on by the constant demands of their children. The couple has a lot to lose: a burgeoning business relationship between Annie and Hank (Rob Lowe) could end if the iPad she's given to Hank exposes the video, and so the couple sets out to reclaim and wipe the incrim...