Skip to main content

BOB MARLEY: ONE LOVE Featurette

Movie Review: 'Freeheld'

Poor casting and a moot topic make Freeheld nothing more than Oscar bait.

Review by Matt Cummings

If the Tom Hanks/Denzel Washington winner Philadelphia touched a nerve for its exposure about AIDS in 1993, the Julianne Moore/Ellen Page Freeheld wants to pull our heartstrings about gay rights. Sadly, its poor casting, dull direction, and a recent Supreme Court decision take the wind out of what should have been an admirable project.

It's not that the plot isn't worth investigating: a highly-decorated New Jersey police officer (Moore) seeks to grant her pension to her domestic partner (Page), but the Ocean County board refuses to do so, based on her sexual orientation. Unfortunately, Director Peter Sollett and Writer Ron Nyswaner surround their actors with primetime network drama and on-the-nose soapbox statements that suck the life out of any real emotion behind the topic. When Laurel and Stacie first hook up, things feel rehearsed rather than spontaneous; as their relationship supposedly deepens, none of it feels genuine. We're meant to believe these two fall madly in love, but the build up is dull and frankly struggles to maintain attention. Their 'marriage' feels empty, not because the 2004 law only made them domestic partners, but because Sollett's direction is so by the book.

Things somewhat improve when Laurel learns about her terminal lung cancer, but only from the perspective that the couple now have something to focus on. When the board (called Freeholders in New Jersey) refuses to allow Laurel to transfer her pension, she tries to appeal, but by that time the cancer is keeping Stacie and her support system are stretched to the limit. And here lies the worst decision of the film: suddenly the gay rights advocate Steve Goldstein (Steve Carell) and his Garden State Equality group turn up to put the fire to the freeholders' feet. Carrell's shtick is usually perfect in the right environment, but here it's so over the top that the mood whipsaws between morbid and comedic. I know that wasn't what intended, but that's the end result.

Moreover, Nyswaner's script adds more drama into the mix than actually existed in real life. And while that cheapens the experience, that's not Freeheld's only sin.. To put it bluntly, a story of this intensity no longer holds the weight it once did, due to the recent Supreme Court ruling over gay marriage. Sure, it's meant to be told based on its backwards viewpoints, but the effect is cold oatmeal: lifeless, lacking in definition. It's really 10 years too late, and probably would have played well back then. But it's this sort of Hollywood-ification that ruins any positive effort Freeheld makes in telling its story.

Moore is of course very good at living Laurel's physical deterioration, providing some of the best moments in the film. But Page - who came out in 2014 - is clearly out of her league, relegated to flickering her eyes (as she always does) when controversy arrives. It's her 'move' and it happens so early and so often that it soon loses its effect. Michael Shannon - who play's Laurel's partner - is another matter entirely. He arrives with a powerful but quiet presence as the person caught in the middle of this new paradigm, risking his job by eventually standing with his former partner. Sadly, Sollett just lets Carell interpret Goldstein in any way he wanted, and the effect makes him an anachronism, a flamboyant gay who displays remarkably little depth. Not even Composer Hans Zimmer can breathe life into this, with the final result feeling like a Lifetime film.

Suffering from a debilitating script, poor casting, and a subject that feels like last 24-hour news cycle, Freeheld is nothing but Oscar bait, designed to pull on emotions that are decidedly less controversial than they were just a few short months ago.

Freeheld is rated PG-13 for some thematic elements, language and sexuality and has a runtime of 103 minutes.

Discuss this review with fellow SJF fans on Facebook. On Twitter, follow us at @SandwichJohnFilms, and follow author Matt Cummings at @mfc90125.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS In Austin

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS on December 5th at 7:30 PM in Austin. MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS explores the turbulent life of Mary Stuart ( Saoirse Ronan ). Queen of France at 16 and widowed at 18, Mary defies pressure to remarry. Instead, she returns to her native Scotland to reclaim her rightful throne alongside her cousin Elizabeth I ( Margot Robbie ), who rules as England’s Queen. Rivals in power and in love, and female monarchs in a masculine world, the two must decide how to play the game of marriage versus independence. Determined to rule as much more than a figurehead, Mary asserts her claim to the English throne, threatening Elizabeth’s sovereignty. Betrayal, rebellion, and conspiracies within each court imperil both thrones – and change the course of history. CLICK HERE TO ENTER- #MaryQueenMovie www.focusfeatures.com/mary-queen-of-scots twitter.com/maryqueenmovie facebook.com/maryqueenmovie instagram.com/maryqueenmovie SEATING IS LIMITE...

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert?

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert? We're halfway checked out for the holiday weekend, so let's end with bit of comedy. A litigious videogame player is calling Winona Ryder to testify as an expert in "alienation." Erik Estavillo has filed a $1 million lawsuit in California Superior Court against Activision Blizzard, publisher of "World of Warcraft," saying it "maintain(s) a harmful virtual environment to many of its customers by forcing them to follow the game's sneaky and deceitful practices." The plaintiff says he suffers from several mental health problems brought on by WoW's "alienating" features, such as forcing beginners to walk or run to get from one point to another instead of speedier options available to those who master the game or buy an expansion pack. Estavillo says that the slow pace is "deceitful" because more time = more subscription revenue for Activision. Here's where Winona Ryder comes...

Sex Tape Review: Overly Sexual, Rude, Vulgar, and Absolutely Hilarious

The raunchy Sex Tape will divide audiences and critics, but who cares? Sex Tape suggests a growing practice among loving partners: that of making a raunchy testament of their escapades for posterity. But what happens when that evidence gets seen by friends, neighbors, and even the mailman? This is the plot that pits Jay (Jason Segel) and Annie (Cameron Diaz) in an effort to secure every iPad gift Jay has given, his record company playlists being the envy of the recipients, but which has also inadvertently spread the video to every device. The reason for the act - termed in the movie as pulling "the full Lincoln " for its three-hour length - stems from the couple's non-existent social life, brought on by the constant demands of their children. The couple has a lot to lose: a burgeoning business relationship between Annie and Hank (Rob Lowe) could end if the iPad she's given to Hank exposes the video, and so the couple sets out to reclaim and wipe the incrim...