Skip to main content

BOB MARLEY: ONE LOVE Featurette

Here's What We Think Of The New Futuristic Cop Show Almost Human

Here's what we think of the new futuristic cop show Almost Human.
By: MattInRC

FOX's new futuristic procedural Almost Human needs a dash of humanity and a sprinkle of bad ass.


Things on television just aren't what they used to be. Not too long ago, premiere schedules were predictable - we sat down in September and enjoyed mostly new episodes clear through April, with season finales just in time for May Sweeps. Now, premieres seem to happen all year, forcing potential viewers to do more work than ever to keep up. Why this happens is something only for morons running FOX, CBS, NBC, and CBS can explain. How did FOX's November 17/18 premiere Almost Human stack up? We give you The Verdict below!

Show: Almost Human (FOX)

Time: Mondays, 8PM


The Concept: A rogue cop and his synthetic partner fight crime in the not-too-distant future.

The Verdict: Stories of trust between machine and man has been debated in Science Fiction for quite some time, with a balance generally struck in which both sides win while making the world better. It's clear that Creator JJ Abrams wants to tell a similar story, and he's cast two likable leads in Karl Urban and Michael Ealy. Both are competent actors, with Urban high on our Bromance List. He's a compelling lead in nearly everything he touches, and has tough cop seemingly written into his DNA. Ealy works as an emotional synthetic, and the two exchange some good lines in the premiere. Lili Taylor is competent as Urban's police chief, but neither she nor hottie Minka Kelly had very much to work with script-wise. Granted, this was a pilot about Urban's John Kennex after he awakens post-ambush that left him in a 17-month coma, and so long as these supporting stories are fleshed out, we'll be happier.


While there's hints of a wider story behind the buddy cop procedural - how Kennex's girlfriend might have been involved in the attack, as well as a mole within the police force - we're a little worried about the show's heart, and the fact that there doesn't appear to be one. Nothing's too terrible here, but nothing is amazing either; the idea of yet another procedural and villain of the week is just not as appealing as it used to be,. Sure, it's the first episode and we felt the same early on about FOX's hit Sleepy Hollow and look where that got us. Almost Human needs to embark on terrific multi-episodic cases, with the synthetic Dorian and the human Kennex struggling to identify themselves in this new world order. The procedural side would benefit from this, giving our characters more time to develop what we hope will be deep and complex backstories, while giving audiences plenty of action and setting up this future in more detail . Early indications are that fans are just as concerned: after a strong Sunday premiere, ratings for the Monday regular slot were rough to say the least.



It's possible that FOX might have another great show on its hands, with its high production value and good cast. But, it also needs to find its footing story-wise - Karl Urban kicking ass while pursuing his past is a compelling mix, so long as each episode finds that balance which makes good television so rewarding. Will Almost Human continue to be as unemotional as the robots which patrol the future's streets, or will it find its soul among the all-too-familiar genre?

Got an opinion about Almost Human? Comment below and join the conversation!

Discuss this article with fellow SJF fans on Facebook. On Twitter, follow us at @SandwichJFilms, and follow author Matt Cummings at @mfc90125.

Please Leave A Comment-

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS In Austin

Enter For A Chance To Win Pass To See MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS on December 5th at 7:30 PM in Austin. MARY QUEEN OF SCOTS explores the turbulent life of Mary Stuart ( Saoirse Ronan ). Queen of France at 16 and widowed at 18, Mary defies pressure to remarry. Instead, she returns to her native Scotland to reclaim her rightful throne alongside her cousin Elizabeth I ( Margot Robbie ), who rules as England’s Queen. Rivals in power and in love, and female monarchs in a masculine world, the two must decide how to play the game of marriage versus independence. Determined to rule as much more than a figurehead, Mary asserts her claim to the English throne, threatening Elizabeth’s sovereignty. Betrayal, rebellion, and conspiracies within each court imperil both thrones – and change the course of history. CLICK HERE TO ENTER- #MaryQueenMovie www.focusfeatures.com/mary-queen-of-scots twitter.com/maryqueenmovie facebook.com/maryqueenmovie instagram.com/maryqueenmovie SEATING IS LIMITE...

Sex Tape Review: Overly Sexual, Rude, Vulgar, and Absolutely Hilarious

The raunchy Sex Tape will divide audiences and critics, but who cares? Sex Tape suggests a growing practice among loving partners: that of making a raunchy testament of their escapades for posterity. But what happens when that evidence gets seen by friends, neighbors, and even the mailman? This is the plot that pits Jay (Jason Segel) and Annie (Cameron Diaz) in an effort to secure every iPad gift Jay has given, his record company playlists being the envy of the recipients, but which has also inadvertently spread the video to every device. The reason for the act - termed in the movie as pulling "the full Lincoln " for its three-hour length - stems from the couple's non-existent social life, brought on by the constant demands of their children. The couple has a lot to lose: a burgeoning business relationship between Annie and Hank (Rob Lowe) could end if the iPad she's given to Hank exposes the video, and so the couple sets out to reclaim and wipe the incrim...

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert?

Winona Ryder- An "Alienation" Expert? We're halfway checked out for the holiday weekend, so let's end with bit of comedy. A litigious videogame player is calling Winona Ryder to testify as an expert in "alienation." Erik Estavillo has filed a $1 million lawsuit in California Superior Court against Activision Blizzard, publisher of "World of Warcraft," saying it "maintain(s) a harmful virtual environment to many of its customers by forcing them to follow the game's sneaky and deceitful practices." The plaintiff says he suffers from several mental health problems brought on by WoW's "alienating" features, such as forcing beginners to walk or run to get from one point to another instead of speedier options available to those who master the game or buy an expansion pack. Estavillo says that the slow pace is "deceitful" because more time = more subscription revenue for Activision. Here's where Winona Ryder comes...